<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ben Barren Blog - Latest Comments in Trying to Find a Good Tweet on a Friday.</title><link>http://benbarrenblog.disqus.com/</link><description>8182f6d60968b368bfce1d99b60cd344</description><atom:link href="https://benbarrenblog.disqus.com/trying_to_find_a_good_tweet_on_a_friday/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:03:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Trying to Find a Good Tweet on a Friday.</title><link>http://www.benbarren.com/?p=5481#comment-29606998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google would kick our ass at finding the good tweet.” : Notion of a “Good” search result - indicating a trade-off between relevance and recency, as well as the authority/insight of the source which is a key objective to offer by year end “Tweet rank.” (possibly similar to the vgood Twinfluence ?) Not without merit, Twitter positioning wise see themselves as “what is happening right now” versus “Google is old news.” Although they recognise “Google has Realtime Content (stocks, weather)”&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chrome Hearts</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:03:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trying to Find a Good Tweet on a Friday.</title><link>http://www.benbarren.com/?p=5481#comment-13222067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that it is amazing that Diddy is making moves in the technology sector! Twitter needs to take a good look at themselves after this! We need to realize that those documents are out of context and irrelevant. I hope Diddy continues tweetin' into the future! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tara1123</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:25:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>